Public Waterfront Hearing Draws Crowd
Glen Cove Planning Board's public Waterfront hearing drew over 100; an even amount of support and opposition was shown.
Over 100 attendees piled into the main chambers of Glen Cove City Hall Tuesday for a public hearing on the $1 billion, 860-unit RXR Glen Isle development of the city’s waterfront.
Many were eager for a chance to have their voices heard on the project's potential impact on the city, including taxes, urbanization, sustainability and burden on city services, such as schools and traffic.
Glen Cove resident Charlie Bozzello received thunderous applause when he called for the project's halt.
"One of the driving factors of people leaving the city is that we once had an economic balance between industrial and residential for centuries," he said. "We've lost our businesses, and our taxes are going up, and this project proposes 860 units without any industrial development. Once this project rolls down the track, there's no possible retreat. The revision I'd like is for this project to be stopped."
One of Bozzello’s concerns reflected those of many others: that developers would receive a PILOT, or abatement, on the tax balance.
"All of these big projects received PILOT's," said resident Suzanne Anderson. "Now you have kids in the school district who aren't paid for yet, and I want to know how this project will effect this."
Several regional business associations appeared at the meeting to support the project, as well as Glen Cove residents excited for the project's benefits to the city's rental market and economy.
"I don't think we should we really tell the 50 percent of people renting in Glen Cove they can just pack up and leave," said Glenn Howard, in response to criticism on the project's proposed 65 percent rental makeup. "Anybody who thinks renters don't pay taxes, the taxes are paid by the landlord and passed on to the renter."
Scott Rechler of RXR Glen Isle said his project is crucial to Glen Cove's future.
"I consider Glen Cove my city, I have so much history here," he said. "This is not a grandiose plan that looks good on paper, though unfeasible in reality; this is something which will succeed in the near term, and it will be something for Glen Cove to be proud of."
Planning Board Chairman Thomas Scott announced the board would take written comments for consideration until Sept. 30, and will hold off on action until all findings on the various issues are complete.
The Glen Isle project at the waterfront will cost $1 billion to build, and will provide 3,500 construction jobs, according to the developer. The project will consist of 860 dwellings in several mid-range buildings, which will include a 250-suite hotel and conference center, a 50,000 square-foot office building, and 25,000 square feet of retail and cultural space.
Brooke D
2:13 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
If these developers really feel that this is such a good thing then they should pay their share of the taxes or better buy residential property here, in Glen Cove. Not Upper Brookville or Oyster Bay but in Glen Cove and better send your kids to the schools here (I don't) and then I'll gladly listen to what you have to offer. Get some skin in the game that's not financed off of garbage loans that you'll only walk away from when things don't work out. And they won't.
And for those of you who are falling for these mis-facts ... Yes renters pay taxes via their landlords, but if the landlord is not paying taxes (via PILOT or Abatement) then the tenant is living here on your dime and not contributing. Sure they might kick in something through sales or business tax but there's really nothing to buy here and no work?
John Jay
4:33 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
I did send my kids to Glen Cove schools and they did great! Keep your negativity to the subject at hand!
A payment in lieu of taxes is a set of increasing payments over time. Abatement - what abatement?
Brooke D
4:42 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Thanks John Jay -
I don't think that there's any negativity here as much as I was disclosing that I chose not to send my kids to school here. Whatever the PILOT v. Abatement is nobody seems to get a straight answer on what's what so if you know otherwise please feel free to share with the group.
Marie Coyle
1:45 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
How sad it was to watch our youth denigrated as they chose to speak up (eloquently I might add) about their excitement as to the vision and the promise of this project. They were actually told by at least two very vocal residents to stay out of Glen Cove if they weren't happy with the way it was. One even alluded to "spoiled brats" It is unfortunate to see the division between some elders and the young and it certainly does not have to be. It is not representative of the Glen Cove I know and love. One must remember how long this project will take, with its checks and balances at the various stages , and know that the future of Glen Cove belongs to those wonderful young professionals who made their case. Let the vision finally be realized.
Jon Citko
4:04 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Brooke has the right idea. Let those people that want to build this monster live in Glen Cove, better yet, let them live in the complex that they want to build. Lets see how many of them get cancer within the first 5 years of living there. But yet they want us to live there, HA!Also let them pay the taxes, opposed to getting a tax break like the present Government has given to a lot f the businesses in Glen Cove to keep them here. Well I say__________! I can't really say what I want to, but many know what should fill the blank.
How can you build on top of a Browns Field, or garbage dump that had failed before and now that you've skimmed off a foot of soil and put new soil down, you think this changes everything! IT changes Nothing!
And the biggest joke is the Ferry. We've had 6 Ferry services in Glen Cove so far and "none" of them have worked. And now they want to bring number 7 into Glen Cove. For what? To fail again! How many times does one have to be hit in the head to find out that it just "doesn't work"!
pocopazzo
4:10 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Does anybody know if Glenn Howard correct about the taxes, or is that a general assumption?
Brooke D
4:34 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Glenn Howard is 100% correct in that renters pay taxes but they pay them indirectly through the person or business that owns their property. If the landlord has a sweetheart deal and doesn't have to pay taxes for 20 years then whomever is living in that property is not paying local taxes. They are paying back the landlord, who may or may not have a loan (not our problem) and we are left to fund the expenses that are incurred by the tenant or tenants. So for everyone of those tenants who are living there "tax free" we are covering the costs. It's sadly that simple. All of these mega-projects have and will continue to bankrupt Glen Cove. Both ethically and economically.
That said, I get the feeling that Howard, who is on the board of the Chamber of Commerce and thereby has a commercial interest in the "monument of mediocrity" being built, is going to try to make this all a class argument pitting those of us who own against those who rent and that could not be further from the truth. I'd be willing to bet that many of those who are paying inflated rents have no idea that little of their rent is going towards supporting civic services.
John Cocchiola
4:18 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
We don't seem to learn from our mistakes, do we?
cc
4:37 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
John,
The only mistake we keep making is putting the same family back in power year after year. It is time for everyone one whether democrat or republican to go to the polls and dump the mayor and his rubber stamp council. If we don't then it is only our fault.
TC6
10:51 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Brooke, your points are spot on, why don't you send them to the local papers and Newsday, etc. for a larger audience!!??
Brooke D
11:47 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Thanks TC - If you don't mind I may quote you there :)
I'd be happy to throw this up to a larger audience I just don't know where to go? Im relatively new to the area (my wife grew up locally) and a software developer so I don't quite know who's who ... which probably explains why I tend to look at all of this with a degree of logic and neutrality ... I just want my house to be worth more than it is :) If anyone has suggestions I'd be happy to discuss. Ping me directly through Patch and I'd be happy to discuss directly. Given some of the anon-aggressive tones on these boards I'd prefer to not broadcast my contact info publicly but I'd be happy to speak/chat/im with anyone who has actual suggestions.
John Jay
8:56 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Brooke, what do you mean by "monument of mediocrity".
The only landlords who pay 0% taxes are the ones that supply the illegal housing in Glen Cove. One of the biggest mouth pieces for Melli is a convicted slum-lord who continuously posts on this web site under a fake name.
rob kormoski
2:36 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
John Jay I agree, one of them is posted above, always making denigrating remarks about the Mayor. We can not afford to keep giving these abatement's to these projects. As Suzanne said the burden will fall to the taxpayers who cannot afford it.
pocopazzo
10:04 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Maybe I missed something, but is it confirmed that the Waterfront & Piazza projects getting tax breaks or deferrals?
Frank DiAnconio
1:32 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Ask John Jay he's an IDA official.He'll tell you all about the pilots and abatements him and his non Industrial Development Agency have dished out to both the Avalonsnow the Piazza!
Suzanne Anderson
1:13 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
I am alos a VERY PROUD parent of my children who attend(ed) Glen Cove Public Schools! I also watch the BOE work so hard every year to give our children the best education possible while looking out for the taxpayers of Glen Cove. The FEIS (before the new rental proposal) is placing approx. 240 children in our schools at a cost of around $3.9 million dollars a year. If the developer is given a PILOT for 20 years or so, we are talking over $60 million to educate children before any taxes are due by the developer. That is quite a burden for the taxpayers of GC..this year alone the BOE will have to face the new 2% tax cap while preparing the budget. Good schools are the foundation of good communities - our children deserve the best we can offer them now - not in twenty years!
P.S. Big Red Football Vs. Sewanakah @ GC High School Saturday 1:30...come see our kids.
Marie Coyle
2:10 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Brooke,,,,You should know that Cities, Towns and Municipalities should be so lucky to have a person of Glen Howard's stature involved in its planning and growth. Glenn has far more than any "commercial interest" in this City. Regardless of which party was in office, Glenn has served on the Planning and Zoning Boards, and for more years that many have lived here, has been an active member of the Chamber of Commerce. Oh, and did I mention that HE LIVES HERE...So before your "feeling" gets you into more trouble, be sure to check your facts. As for the Tax Abatement programs, they are used all over the country to attract business to a locale and to suggest that developers and builders have no skin in the game is to be ignorant of what it takes to see a project from its very beginnings to its fruition.
cc
2:55 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Marie,
If Glen Howard is responsible for planning and growth then he should be run out of town. I lived here for close to 30 years and watched as our elected officials destroyed what was once the Gold Coast. Which if things continue will be come the Ghost Coast! Point out one positive that has happened in the last 30 years? Do the schools compete on the same level of surrounding communities? Can we swim on our beaches? Are there stores to shop in? The retail mix is a joke. If the waterfront is such a valuable piece of property why give it away, let the developer pay a premium? If there is no taxes being collected then make it a park for all to enjoy.
Marie Coyle
3:49 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
No one person is ever responsible for decisions made in accordance with the Municipal Codes. Would you sit on the Zoning Board and/or the Planning board, put in the hours of study of the codes and check every submission to build, or variance thereof and patiently listen to all the concerns of the public, and take a whole lot of verbal abuse in the process? I think not. You may think what you like, but very few of you would provide the years of personal time and service that Glenn Howard has regardless of whether you agree with him or not. He always took his job very seriously, and there was never any doubt in the minds of those who worked with him that he loves this City.
John Jay
4:29 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
One positive that has happened in the last 30 years? = The waterfront has been cleaned up after a century of abuse and is ready for development.
Do the schools compete on the same level of surrounding communities? = Yes, my kids went on to excellent colleges.
Can we swim on our beaches? = Yes, Hemstead Harbor is open to fishing (Crescent is being worked on)
Are there stores to shop in? = Yes, sorry you don't frequent them
pocopazzo
3:16 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Suzanne, does the BOE speak up when the number of children in the system can increase, but the dwellings for these children are outside of the tax rolls? Why aren't they vocal at times like this, when policy can translate into cash for education?
pocopazzo
4:14 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Glenn Howard may be bright and dedicated, but he went ad hominem on Bozzello, referring to his comment as stupid. For somebody who has withstood the verbal abuse of the concerned public, he could show some patience for those of us without the expertise.
Suzanne Anderson
4:19 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
The waterfront hasn't been a topic at the BOE for quite some time. I remember a few years in the past when it was brought up, the superintendent (who is now gone) only cited that the district has the capacity to accommodate the extra population. I don't recall if the impact of PILOT on the district was discussed. I do plan on asking the BOE what impact a business with a PILOT has on the budget especially a project of this size.
I do have to say I am not against (smart) developement - I am just concerned that $3.9 million may be a lot to absorb for our schools and it should definetly be looked into.
cc
4:26 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Marie,
Do you agree that this city has deteriorated in the last 30 years or is it more vibrant? It has been sucked dry by self serving politicians over the years. Is it any surprise that one family of elected officials have had their fingers in the pie! Have you noticed how the retail base has vanished? How the schools are looked down upon by every realtor trying to sell homes in the area. How the beaches can not be used? Give me one reason anyone would want to move to Glen Cove with it's taxes through the roof? Nepotism supreme in city hall and its agency's. They will build the hi-risers and they will become empty like the parking garages. Then the city can fill them like they have with the garages. Just give me one example of something good that is going on in the city?
John Jay
4:31 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
And then the apes will rise up and over throw mankind!!!!!
Marie Coyle
9:29 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
I do not agree this city has deteriorated...It has just changed, and for the better I might add. The elected officials may have had the same last name, but in truth I find them vastly different, just as children in any family may be different. As for the schools, all my FIVE children GCHS, and ALL have successful and excellent careers. I also know that we have one of the best school superintendents I have ever had the honor to meet. He is totally responsive to any inquiry about our schools, and has made it quite clear that the education of our young people is prime. If you have not attended one of his informational meetings, I suggest you do so. I have many visitors from who do not live here, and they only wish they could find a place like Glen Cove to live. It is truly a beautiful city like no other, and I cannot imagine living anywhere else. Examples of something good? The enthusiasm of our young people for where they live, the concerts in the park and in the downtown area, the sense of community that exists between the business owners and their customers, i.e., Mr. Jolly @ Glen Cove Chemists, Glen Floors, Charles Hardware, Page One Restaurant...These are only a small sampling of all those who give so much to this city and makes it the place that I, God Willing, want to live hopelfully for the rest of my life. I really do hope I get to see the vision of a magnificent waterfront completed.
cc
5:21 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
JJ
How long has Crescent Beach been closed? Can you name a store in GC other then a nail salon? How can you even say the schools are on a par with LCV or North Shore? I think you need to take the rose colored glasses off.
Frank DiAnconio
10:36 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
John Jay is a Democrat, of course nothing's wrong with Glen Cove. Furthermore he's an IDA official, of course he won't admit that they've been a total failure for Glen Cove.
John Jay
8:35 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Sorry Frank! A swing and a miss!
Stores in Glen Cove that "CC" does not shop at: Annie Sez, GC Chemist, Staples, GLY, London Jewelry, Safaveih, Accent on the Home, Glen Floor, Charles Hardware, etc...and he must not support any of the restaurants either.
My kids and all of there friends had a great education at GC High School and went on to great colleges and careers.
What do you have against nice nails?
suzy sunflower
5:30 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
IMHO I feel that the planning board and the current administration do not take into consideration the taxpayer's position and they seem to have forgotten who they work for, the residents of Glen Cove, not the developers. Let's just say the waterfront is built as stated the other day. What happens when the city realizes that the firehouse is in a unsafe location due to the increase in traffic from the waterfront and piazza, who is going to pay for that to be relocated?? How about the fact the waterfront is going to need a safe source of drinking water, we are already down one well due to pollution, so another well needs to be drilled offsite, at whose expense?? How about when it is realized that the roads can not handle the increase in traffic, again who is going to pay for that fix. We have already spent millions on that property and I see no income coming back into Glen Cove or at least breaking even for our expenses to clean up that property. As a property owner being held hostage by my ever increasing tax bill, I am becoming very resentful with all the new developments (and old developments, the Regency should have the PILOT revoked, seriously, the Regency is expanding its property) not paying taxes, getting PILOTS and putting the burden on me and other tax payers. The developers want to build, fine, pay your full share of taxes just like you and me.
John Cocchiola
8:42 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Scroll through the photos. Every one was taken in Glen Cove.
http://glencove.patch.com/blog_posts/adapt-to-overcome
pocopazzo
9:40 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Regarding the thread on retail in GC, Big Box stores have taken business from Mom and Pop stores, and now people are using Big Boxes to comparison shop and then buy on-line. Considering that overall trend, Glen Cove is not doing so badly.
John Cocchiola
10:01 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
It's not only the box stores, it's the cost of doing business here, and it's not only Glen Cove, or one party. Everyone has had a hand in it. Nassau County, New York State, now the Federal Government is reaching for more from business. Glen Cove can't sustain it as well as some other places, we're in an isolated cul de sac, our location is awkward. There are a lot of boarded up businesses in Glen Cove, a lot of the ones that are left are hanging on by a thread. In the years to come, there will be a lot more boarded up businesses because our economy isn't improving and the tax and regulatory burden put on businesses is just way too high, especially for this area. There are very few businesses in Glen Cove doing well, I'd bet most business owners aren't making a salary, and a lot more are using their savings to pay taxes and rent. I don't think we need Nostradamus to tell us we're on a dangerous course. My family has been doing business here for almost a century, this has been the toughest time for us, and that includes the Depression.
Marie Coyle
10:34 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
John, Then you also have to know that change (not hope) has to take place. The rising young workforce HAS to want to come here, and the only way they can or will is if the city is growing, vital and inviting. They cannot and will not come or return to the old Glen Cove. It MUST be revitalized, and a beautiful waterfront and a thriving community has to be the draw. The best minds who have created the other successful waterfronts in the country, with input from the citizenry, have spent years researching, redoing, and accommodating our requests as to size and scale. The project will bring employment and business to Glen Cove and begin the momentum. Yes, we will have some disruption and inconvience, but nothing worthwhile comes too easy! Let's get on with it....Go Glen Cove!
Brooke D
4:16 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
This is more for Mary but the threading on these boards are a little strange.
I agree. The waterfront needs to be cleaned but not developed ... yet. Just because a large development is put in place does not mean that it will thrive. Ask the residents of Long Branch, NJ & West Palm Beach, FL. They both had a couple of years of improvement with similar concepts and are now fast becoming huge drains on their economies when they found that they were nothing more than novelties.
That said, our waterfront really is a jewel in the rough. Why not simply clean that and make it a green space (at least on the marina side) and then let entrepreneurs (like myself) decide what they want to build there when the time is right for their business?
If we as a community, and we are all in this together ... like it or not, could work together to improve what we have, including the schools which are not a draw 'today' for young families then over time I have no doubt that Glen Cove will thrive again.
The problem/fear, as I see it, is we keep getting these super-project thrust on us in hopes of hitting a grand slam when in most cases those kinds of projects wind up being a strike-out.
There are some great programs that would help with this and I have no doubt could help fund it.
John Cocchiola
10:41 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Marie, central planning just doesn't work. It's never worked. What they're trying to repair now is the mistakes of the past planners. The way to fix Glen Cove is to make it more business friendly. In order to make it more business friendly, the taxes should be lowered and the regulations should be loosened, or more of us will shrug. When we shrug, the jobs disappear. I've been living in this town for fifty years, and it's the same old soup, just warmed over.
John Cocchiola
11:37 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Just the school taxes that we pay on the property our business is on would be enough to bankrupt a lot of people. It's not competition, business has a way to react to competition. It's the tax burden, and the only way to get around that is to move away. Borders are great things, borders give us options.
pocopazzo
12:10 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
What "rising young workforce" will waterfront residences bring to Glen Cove? Recent grads are having a hard time getting work and repaying college loans.
Marie Coyle
12:31 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
There always has to be a plan or you have chaos. I totally agree with your comments on being business friendly and the tax structure. I too have been here for almost 50 years but I have tried to be a voice for a brighter future and not get stuck complaining about its shortcomings. I'd rather try to change them. As for the "rising young workforce", they were in evidence at the meeting, and my children know many of them. There are also longtime homeowners living in Glen Cove who would love to downsize to an apartment overlooking the harbor. They have told me they would do it "in a heartbeat", so please don't tell me there would be no market for what is being planned.
suzy sunflower
12:37 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Sadly, my advice to my children is leave Long Island. There is no way for them to making a comfortable living here. I will not be far behind them. That is the reality of the situation now. The taxes; school, property, MTA, county and the cost of living is just out of control. I can not see young people coming to live in Glen Cove, there is nothing here for them, so you build shops, restaurants, bars, that is going to bring them???? Once they decided to buy a house and do the math, say good-bye to those "young" people.
John Cocchiola
12:52 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
It's not "Chaos" Marie, what we need is "Spontaneous Order". That's what happens when conditions are right. That's what Capitalism is. There are neighborhoods all over NY City that are being revitalized, not because of city planning, but because the conditions were right. It's up to government to provide a health environment for the private sector to prosper, not to create monstrosities and hope they sell. People are leaving New York, it's leading the country is outmigration. That's not because there isn't beautiful apartments overlooking creeks, it's because the business conditions in this state are terrible. They're approaching the problem from the wrong angle. You saw evidence at the meeting Marie, but there is hard date that contradicts your evidence. Long Island is shrinking in population, New York is losing Congressmen because our population is getting smaller, people are moving to Wilmington, North Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia, and Dallas, Texas, places where there is still a chance to achieve. If you build it, they might not come. Look at the Mets beautiful new ballpark, nearly empty every night. A gorgeous place to see a game, but there isn't anything going on underneath the fluff. That's about where Glen Cove is heading, unfortunately. When the first proposed the waterfront, they were saying "Mystic Seaport". If we're lucky, we'll get Bayville. Empty stores and restaurants in front of some water.
pocopazzo
1:08 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Marie, I heard a young woman speak representing the 20's demographic at the meeting, but that does not mean that there are jobs and income available to sustain young workers at those rents. If they can do it, great, but I ain't buyin' it.
The people you refer to who would downsize to live on the harbor sound like empty-nesters or people who have equity to begin with.
John Cocchiola
1:15 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Here's a "plan". Go easy on business. Cut the School taxes on Commercial Property, cut the payroll tax, drop the ridiculous Transportation tax businesses pay, cut the business income tax, offer business more by taking less. Stop looting the "job creators", 3/5 of jobs in the US are from small businesses, stop treating them like government's ATM machine. That's the fertilizer this City needs, the County, the State and the Country too.
Marie Coyle
1:36 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Great plan and I am with you on that one all the way!. I still think, however, the waterfront and all the beauty the area can offer MUST and can be utilized to enhance, and not detract from, the beauty of this area. It is not wrong to have a vision of what could be as that, too, allows for a phoenix to grow from ashes. What is wrong is to allow and condone continuing decay of that property.
pocopazzo
1:53 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
A couple of speakers brought up Port Jefferson. That is as an example of a waterfront that was developed, but to a degree that retains some character. The scope of this project is ostentatious - and there is no point to it but to maximize profit for investors/developers at the cost of Glen Cove and the other residents around the harbor. I overhead a gentleman in Sea Cliff refer to "that ridiculous project in Glen Cove" (maybe he meant the Piazza). That is my anecdote of how Glen Cove is becoming a joke.
John Cocchiola
2:02 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
I don't mind the cleanup, but most planners, most people in the public sector don't really grasp the private sector. They look at business as a way to fund their projects. Glen Cove is what it is. The only thing that can really help us achieve that dream of becoming a "destinations" is direct train service into Manhattan. The reason Port Washington, Manhasset and Great Neck are busier, the reason their property values are still pretty good is because of that train line. That's really what can help turn us around. Until then, we're just the end of 107. The original "Gold Coast" planners made sure we weren't easy to access, that's the way it's been ever since then. No good highways, no good trains. That's part of the answer.
Brooke D
3:47 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Sorry to jump back in late, but i've had a crazy couple of days. While nobody here really knows me, the fact is that I started to participate on this thread a few months back after I made the decision to not build my business here in Glen Cove. While disappointing, it was the right decision despite the fact that I would love nothing (NOTHING) more than to be able to ride my bike down to the water to work everyday. The economics made no sense.
None of this had to do with who is in office, party affiliation, who's kids went where or where your from. For whatever the reason, Glen Cove is simply not a business destination. This is a residential community that is sadly broke. Now why is it broke? We obviously all have our opinions but I do think that Glen Cove is trying to be something that it is not so we keep running into the same obstacles. Some say that's the definition of insanity.
Building more residences that are not adding to the pool don't help anyone and certainly not us. Also, of the jobs that the construction is going to create, how many would be from Glen Cove? My company helps people find local work so I would love nothing more for that to be the case but I really don't think that it will.
We're all fortunate to be here but I do hope that the powers that be consider real / viable options and fix what we already have & not rush this. Building new stuff is easy!
cc
3:25 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
JJ,
When was the last time you bought shoes in GC? When was the last time you bought socks or underwear in GC? When was the last time you bought pants or a shirt in GC? As far as restaurants, maybe we need more? Well we have how many big box drug chains? Maye we need more? This town house become a dead city for GC? When was the last time you shopped in London Jewelers? Get real and look around your great city. So your children and their friends graduated from GCHS and went to great colleges, that is wonderful. What about the remainder of the student body? Ask any realtor is the schools are a positive selling point.
John Jay
8:25 am on Friday, September 30, 2011
CC, great news! You can finally get yourself new underwear! At the new retail store opening downtown!